LOGIN

International Epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS

Home >> Publications >> Strong agreement of nationally recommended retention measures from the Institute of Medicine and Department of Health and Human Services.

Publication

Author(s):

Rebeiro PF, Horberg MA, Gange SJ, Gebo KA, Yehia BR, Brooks JT, Buchacz K, Silverberg MJ, Gill J, Moore RD, Althoff KN; North American AIDS Cohort Collaboration on Research and Design (NA-ACCORD).

Pub Title:

Strong agreement of nationally recommended retention measures from the Institute of Medicine and Department of Health and Human Services.

Pub Date:

Nov 6 2014

Journal:

Title: 
PLoS One
Link: 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25375099

PubMed: 25375099
Pub PDF: PDF icon 25375099_0.pdf

Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
We sought to quantify agreement between Institute of Medicine (IOM) and Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) retention indicators, which have not been compared in the same population, and assess clinical retention within the largest HIV cohort collaboration in the U.S.

DESIGN: Observational study from 2008-2010, using clinical cohort data in the North American AIDS Cohort Collaboration on Research and Design (NA-ACCORD).

METHODS: Retention definitions used HIV primary care visits. The IOM retention indicator was: ≥2 visits, ≥90 days apart, each calendar year. This was extended to a 2-year period; retention required meeting the definition in both years. The DHHS retention indicator was: ≥1 visit each semester over 2 years, each ≥60 days apart. Kappa statistics detected agreement between indicators and C statistics (areas under Receiver-Operating Characteristic curves) from logistic regression analyses summarized discrimination of the IOM indicator by the DHHS indicator.

RESULTS: Among 36,769 patients in 2008-2009 and 34,017 in 2009-2010, there were higher percentages of participants retained in care under the IOM indicator than the DHHS indicator (80% vs. 75% in 2008-2009; 78% vs. 72% in 2009-2010, respectively) (p<0.01), persisting across all demographic and clinical characteristics (p<0.01). There was high agreement between indicators overall (κ = 0.83 in 2008-2009; κ = 0.79 in 2009-2010, p<0.001), and C statistics revealed a very strong ability to predict retention according to the IOM indicator based on DHHS indicator status, even within characteristic strata.

CONCLUSIONS: Although the IOM indicator consistently reported higher retention in care compared with the DHHS indicator, there was strong agreement between IOM and DHHS retention indicators in a cohort demographically similar to persons living with HIV/AIDS in the U.S. Persons with poorer retention represent subgroups of interest for retention improvement programs nationally, particularly in light of the White House Executive Order on the HIV Care Continuum.

The following websites provide guidelines and policies when citing from PubMed®: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK7243/
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/policy/cit_format.html

Citation:

Rebeiro PF, Horberg MA, Gange SJ, Gebo KA, Yehia BR, Brooks JT, Buchacz K, Silverberg MJ, Gill J, Moore RD, Althoff KN; North American AIDS Cohort Collaboration on Research and Design (NA-ACCORD). Strong agreement of nationally recommended retention measures from the Institute of Medicine and Department of Health and Human Services. PLoS One. 2014 Nov 6;9(11):e111772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111772. eCollection 2014. PubMed PMID: 25375099; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4222946.